Episode 188: The Language Myth (featuring Vyvyan Evans)

How do children learn language so quickly?

For decades, the prevailing view has been that they’re born with it. But a new breed of linguists is overturning this view with evidence from human evolution, cognition, and actual children.

Among these researchers is Dr Vyvyan Evans, author of a new book The Language Myth. Vyv speaks with Daniel Midgley on this episode of Talk the Talk.


Listen to this episode

Or subscribe via iTunes
Click here for more options: How to listen to Talk the Talk


Promo with Kylie Sturgess


Show notes

Google adds Irish to list of Gmail options
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/12/11/irish-minority-languages.html

You can learn Irish on Duolingo
https://www.duolingo.com/comment/4277962

10 Reasons Why Irish Is an Absolutely Awesome Language
http://multikulti.wordpress.com/2014/09/15/10-reasons-why-irish-is-an-absolutely-awesome-language/

The publication page for “The Language Myth: Why Language Is Not an Instinct”. Also in paperback.
http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/languages-linguistics/cognitive-linguistics/language-myth-why-language-not-instinct#contentsTabAnchor

Vyvyan Evans explains why there is no language instinct.
http://aeon.co/magazine/culture/there-is-no-language-instinct/

Semantic satiation semantic satiation semantic satiation
http://grammar.about.com/od/rs/g/Semantic-Satiation.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_satiation


Show tunes

‘Birthday Beat’ by Shlomo
from the album Shlomoshun Redux

‘Knock Knock Knock’ by Spoon
from the album They Want My Soul

Image credit: http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2014/11/into-the-intro-the-language-myth/

1 Comment

  1. This discussion did a rather poor job of presenting the Chomskyan position. The idea of innate grammatical knowledge wasn't pure speculation, or just a knee-jerk reaction to the fact that the problem looks too hard; it was a conclusion that is argued for on the basis of poverty-of-stimulus arguments. There is some debate over whether poverty-of-stimulus arguments actually go through, but it's a substantive debate where both sides grapple with "the actual data". Suggesting that no one on "the Chomskyan side" backs up their position with data is quite disingenuous.

    It would be great if you would consider doing a follow-up episode that discusses the poverty-of-stimulus arguments for Chomsky-style innate knowledge.

Comments are closed.

© 2017 Talk the Talk

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑